25
Nov
“In investing, what is comfortable is rarely profitable.” — Robert Arnott
You’re about to deploy $5M into a Florida self-storage deal.
Your broker shows you two opportunities:
Which do you choose?
If you picked Deal A based solely on IRR, you just made the same mistake that cost one investor $3.2M in our recent portfolio analysis.
Here’s what the IRR didn’t tell you:
Deal A had a 38% chance of losing money in a recession. Deal B? Only 12%.
Same capital. Radically different risk.
The uncomfortable truth: IRR is a lie—or at least, only half the story.
William Sharpe won the Nobel Prize in Economics for answering one simple question:
“How much return am I getting per unit of risk I’m taking?”
That question changed investing forever.
Yet 59 years later, most self-storage investors still underwrite deals using only IRR—a metric that completely ignores risk.
The result?
Today, you’re going to learn the 3 metrics institutional investors use to separate real opportunities from expensive mistakes.
And the best part? You can calculate all three in under 10 minutes.
What it measures: Return per unit of total risk (volatility)
Why it matters: A 20% IRR with wild swings might be worse than a steady 15% IRR.
Formula:
Sharpe Ratio = (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) ÷ Standard Deviation
Real-World Translation:
Florida Self-Storage Benchmark:
Case Study Snapshot:
We analyzed a $9M Tampa facility:
Red flag: You’re taking on significant volatility for mediocre risk-adjusted returns. Institutional buyers walked away.
After renegotiating $1.1M off the price:
Same asset. Better entry. Institutional-grade returns.
The Sharpe Ratio’s fatal flaw: It penalizes upside volatility.
If your facility unexpectedly jumps from 85% to 95% occupancy, Sharpe treats that as “risk.” But that’s good news!
The Sortino Ratio fixes this by measuring only downside deviation (actual loss risk).
Formula:
Sortino Ratio = (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) ÷ Downside Deviation
Real-World Translation:
Florida Self-Storage Benchmark: Aim for 1.8-2.3 on stabilized assets, 1.3-1.8 on value-add deals.
Why This Matters:
Two deals, same 18% IRR:
The difference? Deal Y offers the same upside with 65% less downside risk.
What it measures: Annual return divided by maximum drawdown (worst peak-to-trough loss)
Why it matters: Shows whether your returns justify the worst-case loss you might endure.
Formula:
Calmar Ratio = Annual Return ÷ Maximum Drawdown
Real-World Translation:
Florida Self-Storage Benchmark: Aim for 1.5-2.2 on stabilized assets, 1.0-1.6 on value-add deals.
The $2.7M Reality Check:
We underwrote two Central Florida expansion deals:
Same IRR. Radically different capital efficiency.
Deal Beta delivered the same returns with 64% smaller maximum loss exposure.
The capital efficiency difference: $2.7M on a $10M equity deployment.
Here’s how to calculate these for YOUR next deal:
Model your deal under:
Use Excel: =STDEV.S(range)
This measures total volatility across your scenarios.
Example: $8.5M Polk County facility
Translation: Strong risk-adjusted returns across all metrics. Institutional-grade opportunity.
Example: $12M Orange County expansion
Translation: Returns don’t fully justify the risk. Consider:
Example: $15M Lee County REIT acquisition
Translation: Returns nowhere near sufficient for risk. Three institutional buyers passed. Seller eventually reduced price by $2.3M and restructured seller financing.
Remember Deal A vs. Deal B from the opening?
The revelation:
Deal A had a 38% probability of underperforming a 15% hurdle rate. Deal B had only a 12% probability.
Our client chose Deal B.
Three years later:
Value of knowing these three numbers: $3.2M in avoided losses.
Before you close your next self-storage deal:
□ Calculate Sharpe Ratio→ Minimum threshold: 1.0 (aim for 1.2+)
□ Calculate Sortino Ratio→ Minimum threshold: 1.5 (aim for 1.8+)
□ Calculate Calmar Ratio → Minimum threshold: 1.0 (aim for 1.5+)
□ Compare to benchmarks:
□ Document your findings:
□ Present to investors/lenders:
IRR is not wrong. It’s incomplete.
IRR tells you the speed. Risk ratios tell you if the road has guardrails.
Two deals with 18% IRRs are not the same if one has a Sharpe of 0.7 and the other has a Sharpe of 1.6.
The institutional difference:
Sophisticated investors don’t ask: “What’s the IRR?”
They ask: “What’s the Sharpe Ratio? What’s the Sortino? What’s the Calmar? How does this compare to our portfolio hurdles?”
Now you’re asking the same questions.
You’ve just learned the three metrics that separate institutional-grade analysis from amateur underwriting.
But this is only the beginning.
In our Advanced Guide (coming next), we’ll show you:
And in our Expert Guide, we’ll dive into:
Want these insights delivered weekly?
🌱 Sustainable Investing Digest → Subscribe on LinkedIn – Subscribe on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7053058780464345088 💪 Global Empowerment Leadership → Subscribe on LinkedIn – Subscribe on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7060440518475804672
💬 Your Turn
Question: Are you currently calculating risk-adjusted returns for your self-storage deals, or relying solely on IRR?
👍 Like | 💬 Comment | 🔄 Share if this changed how you evaluate deals!
🏢 Buying/Selling Self-Storage with RV/Boat Storage?
Contact Skyline Property Experts | 786-676-4937
📊 Need Risk-Ratio Analysis for Your Deal?
Contact Capital Advisors USA | First portfolio review complimentary
Because the difference between an 18% IRR and an institutional-grade 18% IRR is knowing your Sharpe, Sortino, and Calmar.
Let’s finish the week strong. 💪
#SelfStorage #RiskManagement #SharpeRatio #SortinoRatio #CalmarRatio #RealEstateInvesting #FloridaCRE #InvestmentAnalysis #PortfolioManagement #RVStorage #BoatStorage #CommercialRealEstate #CRE #InstitutionalInvesting #RiskAdjustedReturns #FinancialModeling #DueDiligence #SmartInvesting 📊💼🎯